Some legitimate blogger is linking and criticizing my post on Duckworth's sloppy meta-analysis and threatening my well-deserved obscurity. Her post was too boring to finish but she seemed to imply that I would not submit my analysis to a peer reviewed journal because of my blog roll of bad guys or something. That is incorrect. As you can tell from this sorry excuse of a blog, I am very lazy.
The only reason I posted on Duckworth's tedious meta-analysis is that the results are driven by a paper written by someone who actually pleaded guilty to a research related crime. That was too hilarious to pass up. That and the fact that you can publish a meta-analysis in PNAS without a forest plot.
2 comments:
When I try to visit your blog, blogspot first gives me a content warning.
TGGP,
Yes. I decided you need to be an adult to read Statsquatch.
Post a Comment